On the Priority of the Aristotelian Polis over the Individual The Polis as a Hylomorphic Whole
Articles
Christos Panayides
University of Nicosia, Cyprus
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-4996
Published 2024-04-24
https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.2024.105.1
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Aristotle
Polis
Existential Priority
Priority in Being
Hylomorphism

How to Cite

Panayides, C. (2024) “On the Priority of the Aristotelian Polis over the Individual The Polis as a Hylomorphic Whole”, Problemos, 105, pp. 8–20. doi:10.15388/Problemos.2024.105.1.

Abstract

In Politics I 2 (1253a18–27), Aristotle makes a controversial claim that the polis is prior in nature to the individual. The aim of this article is to reconstruct this thesis. According to recent scholarship, there are two main ways to understand priority in nature in Aristotle. It may be construed as ‘existential priority, or as ‘priority in being’. It is argued that: (a) The first option is problematic; it cannot give us a viable reading of the thesis in Politics I 2. Whereas (b) The second option provides us with a sound approach to the puzzle at hand. Furthermore, it is argued that the exegetical plausibility of the suggested reading of the thesis in Politics I 2 (1253a18–27) may be bolstered if we note that, for Aristotle, the polis is a particular kind of hylomorphic whole.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.