Abstract
The article presents some etudes on the distinction between disengaged, objectifying and engaged, existential thinking. The differences between them are showed through their attitude to the metaphor of the labyrinth. The author overviews some notions of R. Descartes, G.W.R. Hegel, on the one side, and S.Kierkegaard, L. Wittgenstein, on the other. It is argued that the disengaged, objectifying thinking seeks to foresee, to go beyond the labyrinth as the nexus of the one-sided, contingent situations. The engaged thinking, contrary, accepts the labyrinth of the everyday situations. It permanently transgresses the labyrinth only by means of the intensity of the concrete engagement.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Nerijus Milerius,
ŽANRINIO APOKALIPSĖS KINO DEKONSTRUKCIJA A. KUROSAWOS „RASHOMONE“
,
Problemos: Vol. 83 (2013): Problemos
-
Nerijus Milerius,
VIOLENCE AS THE CONDITION OF MODERNITY: THE CASE OF F. T. MARINETTI AND G. SIMMEL
,
Problemos: Vol. 90 (2016): Problemos
-
Nerijus Milerius,
Reconsidering the Foundations of the Concept of Reflection of R. Descartes and I. Kant in the Transcendental Phenomenology of E. Husserl
,
Problemos: Vol. 50 (1996): Problemos
-
Nerijus Milerius,
ELEKTRONINIS POSŪKIS: NUO FIZINIO MIESTO LINK E-TOPOS MIESTO
,
Problemos: Vol. 71 (2007): Problemos
-
Nerijus Milerius,
Theoretical Problems of Cartography: The Case of Vilnius
,
Problemos: Vol. 66 (2004): Problemos
-
Nerijus Milerius,
The Cartesian Thinking Subject: The Problem of the Nongnoseological Dimension
,
Problemos: Vol. 52 (1998): Problemos