Islands of Slavic Languages in the Northeastern Aukštaitijan (Highlanders) (NEA) Area: Linguistic and Cultural Contexts
Articles
Asta Balčiūnienė
Klaipėda University, Lithuania image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0487-3012
Violeta Meiliūnaitė
Institute of the Lithuanian Language, Lithuania image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0862-0709
Published 2025-02-20
https://doi.org/10.15388/SlavViln.2024.69(2).13
PDF

Keywords

varieties of Lithuanian
Slavic languages
Russian
Northeastern Aukštaitijans
Social Functions of Language

How to Cite

Balčiūnienė, A. and Meiliūnaitė, V. (2025) “Islands of Slavic Languages in the Northeastern Aukštaitijan (Highlanders) (NEA) Area: Linguistic and Cultural Contexts”, Slavistica Vilnensis, 69(2), pp. 114–130. doi:10.15388/SlavViln.2024.69(2).13.

Abstract

The Northeastern Aukštaitijan (NEA) sub-dialect area analysed in this paper is traditionally characterised by numerous linguistic and cultural links. For a relatively long time, people of different nationalities (Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Russian, Jewish), speaking their own ethnic languages, lived in this area side by side.

After analysing the available data, one can state that, in the early twenty-first century, the Lithuanian language occupies the position of the strongest language variety in all the subdialect areas under discussion. For various socio-cultural reasons, local Slavs adopt the local (but usually not standard) variety of the Lithuanian language and, when speaking Lithuanian, they retain some of the less noticeable characteristics of their native languages.

The loss of language as one of the main indicators of national identity is a gradual process: from the active use by the rural community, it proceeds to the home/family domain, and finally, to the last phase of use: the internal language.

Since Slavic speakers have very limited opportunities to develop social contacts locally in their mother tongues, Russian-speaking members of local communities get intensively integrated into the local Lithuanian-speaking community.

Thus, it can be predicted that the Russian-language islands at Papilỹs and Vabalniñkas subdialect areas may disappear quite quickly. In the early twenty-first century, the Antašavà (Dar̃šiškiai) subdialect area is to be considered linguistically homogeneous: it is dominated by the Lithuanian language regiolect.

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.